|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
Ki Tarra
Caldari
Ki Tech Industries
   |
Posted - 2009.02.11 16:00:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Valeria Crossroads
Is CCP insane?
No, they are sane, thus they banned all the hauler and market alts as well as the exploiters' main characters.
Just helping your corp mates is not going to get you banned. Participating in an RMT/exploit profit laundering operation will get you banned.
|
Ki Tarra
Caldari
Ki Tech Industries
|
Posted - 2009.02.11 18:27:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Valeria Crossroads
Its clear CCP just banned big groups so they would be sure they had all involved and that innocent bystanders are a victim in the process does not seem to bother them. Very sad. 
Do you need to add another layer to your tinfoil hat?
What sort of response could possibly satasfy you?
At one end you have CCP banning every innocent player who might have even chatted with the exploiters.
At the other you have CCP doing nothing more than fixing the bug, because they can't prove that the exploiters knew that what they were doing was wrong.
Do you expect CCP to violate their privacy and non-disclosure policies to list off all 134 account, each of the characters on those accounts, along with the email IP addresses, and other personally identifying information about those users. Publish complete transcripts of the banned users professions of innocense and/or ignorance, along with the counter-point evidence discovered by CCP detailing the transactions and action of those players both directly and indirectly relevant to the exploit.
Is there any hope that you might take CCP at its word when it says that it conducted a complete investigation, and that it follows its policies and proceedures for estabilishin reasonable evidence of foul play?
If you are unwilling to extend even a basic level of trust to CCP, why are you even playing this game.
If there was reasonable grounds to believe that a specific director was innocent, then it is doubtful that he would have been banned just because he held a title, even if that is how you choose to read the dev blog.
|
Ki Tarra
Caldari
Ki Tech Industries
|
Posted - 2009.02.11 19:19:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Valeria Crossroads
Quote:
Direct involvement meant that the character had a director role in the corporation using the exploit
Like they say it themselves: a director role is all it takes.
There was atleast one other case where their choice in wording caused confusion.
Perhaps GM Grimmi would be kind enough to explain what was actually ment.
How much accountablity does a director have for the actions of the corp membership?
|
Ki Tarra
Caldari
Ki Tech Industries
|
Posted - 2009.02.11 19:20:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Vaerah Vahrokha
Quote:
Like they say it themselves: a director role is all it takes.
When I was "director" in one of my 2 companies in real life, you can stay the hell sure they'd claim me as responsible for the employees actions.
If you can't stand responsibility, don't be a director, simple as that.
Yes, but Eve is not real life. Not even remotely close to it.
|
|
|
| |
|